![]() The dog’s head position lowered after the lame forelimb pushed off and during the swinging of the affected forelimb. Similarly, pelvic was higher during induced swinging limb lameness in the hindlimb: (-10.9mm and -3mm) left and right hindlimb lameness respectively, compared with 2.7mm before induction of lameness. This study found dogs with induced swinging forelimb lameness held their head higher during the swing phase: (-28.5mm and 20.1mm) for left and right forelimb lameness respectively, compared with 1.3mm before induction of lameness. Fore and hind limb lameness was induced by placing a weight proximal to the dog’s carpus and tarsus. After a period during which the dogs were accustomed to treadmill trotting, measurements were taken. Measurements were taken while the dogs were trotting on a treadmill. Measurements of the positions of the anatomical structures to which the markers were attached were collected before and after induced lameness. The study involved 10 dogs upon which reflective markers were attached to the: “hip hike” on affected sideĪ study of dogs with induced lameness sought to quantify vertical motion symmetry of the head, pelvis and hip during the swing phase as a way to develop a broader understanding of compensatory movement. Increase in vertical hip motion on the affected side during stance phase of sound hind limb i.e.Lowest pelvic position during initial and mid stance of sound hind limb.Lowest head position during stance of sound fore limb.Visual indicators of lameness are changes in the head and pelvis position through the stride cycle as follows:. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |